Quote:
Tennessee lawmakers are considering a proposal by state Rep. John Deberry to make it a misdemeanor to intentionally display or expose "an imitation firearm in a public place in a threatening manner." Exceptions include justifiable self defense, lawful hunting, and displays such as a museum collection.
Guess the museum defence is worldwide?
Those other two exceptions make absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Who hunts with a fake gun? Maybe an air-rifle that is powerful enough, but shouldn't those fall under firearms anyway?
And "justifiable self defense"? Again, what does this imply?
I was about to be robbed so I pulled out my realistic toy M92 and scarred the thugs away.
Best case senario the thugs run away (or are captured by the police). Worst case the thugs pull out their
real guns an blow away the victim or the victim gets shot by the police.
At any rate I think it is extrodinarily dangerous to encourage the public that it would be ok to carry an imitation firearm for the purpose of self defense.
What about a kid who brings one to school because he wants to scare off the bullies who have been beating him up for his lunch money- then the school is evacuated and the SWAT team called in because someone saw this kid with a gun?
If all they are asking for are stiffer penalties for people who commit crimes with fake weapons/ disturb the public peace by brandishing them in public in a manner that can be perceived as threatening (IE acting like an idiot with what looks like a real gun)... so be it. But removing realistic toys/replicas altogether is something else.
Haven't some states already banned replica guns? I thought there was a complete ban in NY?