SSgt Burton wrote:
(Warning- rant ahead

)
I'm not an actor (although I probably should have been, but that is neither here nor there), I'm not a producer, director, or writer (although I did write an Aliens short story).
An AWARD WINNING Aliens short story if I'm not mistaken.

Quote:
I'm a moviegoer. I'm a fan. I don't watch a film to compare notes on "what I would have done instead"- I watch a film to be entertained.
True.
Quote:
How would you like to go see your favourite baseball team, and when they are getting their asses handed to them, have one of the players turn around to the crowd and scream out, "Hey! Let's see you do better!"
Well, if it was FOOTBALL, and we were talking about the MN Vikings... you'd probably have some people take 'em up on the offer. Well, it beats having one of your receivers push a meter maid with his car... or get busted for a party barge orgy...
Quote:
It's a copout. And quite frankly I find that argument insulting.
Nobody sets out to make a bad film on purpose-
I think people like Uwe Boll, who's produced and directed some of the worst video game movie related SHLOCK ever seen might disagree with you... behind the closed doors of his multi-million dollar mansion.
At least Roger Coreman admitted he was making shlock, and reveled in it, turning his low budget horror/comedy films into it's own genre...
Quote:
but many great artistic ideas get shelved because of money, and/or release dates. Great actors are not considered simply because they can get cheaper unknowns to fill a role. Basically by some suit in an office who doesn't give a rats ass about a franchise.
Exactly. Movie studios are in business to do one thing: Make Money. Why hire (Insert name of good actor here) when you can get (unknown doofus) for $50,000 as opposed to 1.5 Million?
Hell, look at the TRAINWRECK that was "Starship Troopers 2."
That was a case of people trying to do different things, when the fans wanted something similar to the first film. People couldn't get over the fact it was a first time director (but veteran FX guru) and it turned out the way it did. Plus, it had no budget. But I digress. As usual...
Quote:
If a film is bad- it's my prerogative to talk about it being bad, and why.
That's your call bro, but it doesn't change the fact that it was made, poorly (in whatever instance) or not up to "your" expectations. How many times have we complained about how bad (Aliens sequel #whatever) was because it was different, or didn't live up to OUR expectations, and at the same we ALSO complain when a film (any genre) comes out that is pretty much a carbon copy of the previous one?
I know in the past I've been guilty of that one as well. Movie makers either:
a) Make what they want according to THEIR own vision.
Or...
b) crank out whatever the public will swallow at the moment.
Quote:
Sorry Russ- please don't think this has been directed at
you specifically. You're not the first person to utter that phrase (and of course, won't be the last).
No problemo Kev! No blood, no foul!

Quote:
Of course I don't want AvP2 to suck, I want it to be spectacular! I want it to re-energize the franchise (like how "Batman Begins" re-wrote the genre doing away with the disastrous "Batman and Robin" that killed the franchise for 8 years).
And it wouldn't hurt to see some Marines again (even modern day Devil Dogs!).

Heh. I guess I won't mention again that aside from a couple technical issues (the hyper breeding facehugger/Alien transition) I actually liked AvP.
Oh wait, I just did.
Here's to hoping the next one will be everything everyone wants.
If not, I'll be waiting in line for "Ironman" and "Indiana Jones 4."
Russ