Many good points all around!
Quote:
I do know there is a difference between the caliber and 'type', old chap, wouldn't have been very good at my previous job if I didn't!
Don't take me too seriously my friend; sometimes I get a little too dramatic.
I'm not too sure if everyone is getting the point I'm trying to make (I think Tom's got the right idea

).
One of the major themes on the movie is that the Marines are on the cutting edge of military might and firepower. This is echoed throughout the film with Frost's PTSF shirt- Burke telling Ripley the Marines are packing "state-of-the-art fire power" and of course Hudson's Ultimate Badasses speech. And yet are completely decimated by a technologically inferior (they use claws and bite for crying out loud) but overwhelmingly ferocious enemy.
This was an allegory of the US forces during the Vietnam war.
So the weaponry carried by the Marines is at the forefront of 22nd century firearms.
Maybe it would be a little more dramatic if I said a SWAT team member pulled out a sword instead?
I still think there is a bad joke in there somewhere.
The VP70 was choosen because it still had a futuristic look to it with it's polymer frame. It wasn't being presented as "old".
But I do agree that Vasquez's M39 is in the same boat with Hicks' shotty. And I do accept that shotguns would still be around in 200 years and probably would not change much as they haven't over the last 200 years.
So would Marines be allowed the latitude of carrying personal weapons in the field? Or did Cameron get that
really wrong? I know this probably goes with Cameron's idea of the Marines being so far from any real chain of command, that they have been given certain liberties (the personalized armour and blatant lack of discipline).