companyman wrote:
Yeah, it does tend to swing one way then another.
Before the Vietnam War, the US military didn't like the idea of camouflage as it may encourage troops to hide - short sightedness like assuming the next war would be against Warsaw Pact forces, so as everyone will be in APCs, a butt pack is enough.
Indeed: and to expand on this, to illustrate my previous points about the military 'relearning things every so often':
The ERDL Camo pattern was first developed in 1948- clearly in time for Korea- but was never officially issued until 1967, and then only on a limited basis for troops with the most urgent requirements....Indeed, it wasn't fully issued across the board by the withdrawl of US ground troops from Vietnam in 1972.
The reason it was shelved was the aforementioned concern about encouraging a 'lack of agression', a general concern that the USSR would be relying entirely on IR searchlights in any prospective Cold War-Gone-Hot war (rendering normal camo pointless) and because some genius in the US DOD pointed out that at 75m and further, the colours all blended into a uniform single shade of green- meaning camoflage for general ground troops was worthless- and ERDL was shelved.

.....hence Olive Drab being the 'issue' colouration for US uniforms from the end of WW2 until after the involvement in Vietnam.
The recall of of ERDL into urgent production in the 1960s was as a direct result of combat reports demonstrating that infantry engaugements in Vietnam rarely exceeded 75m, and were typically 30m and under.....So, instead of benefiting from 20 years of development, the ERDL pattern was dusted off and mustered into use. Problems were highlighted almost immediately: the poplin uniforms were fragile in the extreme in normal use- resulting in units issues with it looking like a hobo convention after a short time in the field.